A Survival Analysis of Patients with Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on Relapse Type: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study in Armenia.

BACKGROUND: Annually, approximately 200 new ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed in Armenia, which is considered an upper-middle-income country. This study aimed to summarize the survival outcomes of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer in Armenia based on the type of recurrence, risk factors, and choice of systemic treatment. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 228 patients with relapsed ovarian cancer from three different institutions. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 55. The median follow-up times from relapse and primary diagnosis were 21 and 48 months, respectively. The incidence of platinum-sensitive relapse was 81.6% (186), while platinum-resistant relapse was observed in only 18.4% (42) of patients. The median post-progression survival of the platinum-sensitive group compared to the platinum-resistant group was 54 vs. 25 months (p < 0.001), respectively, while the median survival after relapse was 25 vs. 13 months, respectively; three- and five-year post-progression survival rates in these groups were 31.2% vs. 23.8%, and 15.1% vs. 9.5%, respectively (p = 0.113). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, despite new therapeutic approaches, ovarian cancer continues to be one of the deadly malignant diseases affecting women, especially in developing countries with a lack of resources, where chemotherapy remains the primary available systemic treatment for the majority of patients. Low survival rates demonstrate the urgent need for more research focused on this group of patients with poor outcomes.

Patterns of sex hormone receptor expression in stimulated endometrium from oocyte donors.

In patients with high serum E2 embryo transfer is often postponed, as high E2 levels adversely affect embryo transfer outcome. We aimed to determine if stratified serum oestradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels differentially affect endometrial histology and endometrial oestrogen and progesterone receptor protein levels. Endometrial biopsies were collected from oocyte donors. Samples were divided based on peak serum E2 levels into three groups: (i) low-E2 (n = 33) E2≤2999pg/mL; (ii) mid-E2 (n = 40) E2 3000-4999 pg/mL; and (iii) high-E2 (n = 15) E2≥5000 pg/mL. Oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptors A and B (PR) protein levels in endometrial stroma (S), glandular (GE) and luminal (LE) epithelia were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Samples in high-E2 group demonstrated strongest association with accelerated endometrial maturation (2 (1-2); 2 (1-3); and 3 (2.8-3) median days of advancement of endometrial maturation respectively in low, mid, high-E2 groups, p = 0.046). There were significant differences in ERα and PR immunoexpression in S, GE and LE among the groups (p < 0.05). Higher E2 levels were associated with decreased ERα expression (p < 0.017) in GE and LE, and increased PR expression in S and GE (p < 0.011 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Higher serum E2 levels were associated with impaired endometrial steroid hormone receptor expression, higher serum P4 and more advancement of endometrial maturation.

In vitro evidence that platelet-rich plasma stimulates cellular processes involved in endometrial regeneration.

PURPOSE: The study aims to test the hypothesis that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) stimulates cellular processes involved in endometrial regeneration relevant to clinical management of poor endometrial growth or intrauterine scarring. METHODS: Human endometrial stromal fibroblasts (eSF), endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSC), bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC), and Ishikawa endometrial adenocarcinoma cells (IC) were cultured with/without 5% activated (a) PRP, non-activated (na) PRP, aPPP (platelet-poor-plasma), and naPPP. Treatment effects were evaluated with cell proliferation (WST-1), wound healing, and chemotaxis Transwell migration assays. Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) was evaluated by cytokeratin and vimentin expression. Differential gene expression of various markers was analyzed by multiplex Q-PCR. RESULTS: Activated PRP enhanced migration of all cell types, compared to naPRP, aPPP, naPPP, and vehicle controls, in a time-dependent manner (p < 0.05). The WST-1 assay showed increased stromal and mesenchymal cell proliferation by aPRP vs. naPRP, aPPP, and naPPP (p < 0.05), while IC proliferation was enhanced by aPRP and aPPP (p < 0.05). There was no evidence of MET. Expressions of MMP1, MMP3, MMP7, and MMP26 were increased by aPRP (p < 0.05) in eMSC and eSF. Transcripts for inflammation markers/chemokines were upregulated by aPRP vs. aPPP (p < 0.05) in eMSC and eSF. No difference in estrogen or progesterone receptor mRNAs was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study evaluating the effect of PRP on different human endometrial cells involved in tissue regeneration. These data provide an initial ex vivo proof of principle for autologous PRP to promote endometrial regeneration in clinical situations with compromised endometrial growth and scarring.